The Washington Post reports:

Now this is an interesting development.  One might suppose that 600,000 dead Civil War soldiers would go some way towards redeeming America"s "original sin."  Was slavery wrong?  Of course it was, and we paid a heavy, heavy price to set it right.

This apology, we are told, isn"t about setting things right; it"s about taking responsibility.  There"s grounds for confusion on this point.  The U.S. Senate is famously America"s most exclusive old-age home, but surely there aren"t any Senators so old that they actually owned slaves themselves, are there?  Admittedly, the decrepit Senator Robert Byrd (D, WV), as an ex-KKK official, might have wanted to, but even he does not predate the 13th Amendment and its ban on slavery and/or involuntary servitude.

Yet he, and the other Senators, wish to apologize for slavery on your behalf.  Do they represent you in this?  Are you sorry for your vile actions while you personally collaborated in this evil crime?  I"m not!

Responsibility for What?

Those of us who have children can recall countless times where Child A hit Child B, and as parents, we enforced an apology.  "Tell your little brother you"re sorry!"  "What was that?  I can"t hear you!"  Obviously, these are somewhat grudging expressions of contrition, not exactly heartfelt, but such apologies make parents feel better.

Then there are times when Child A protests, "I did not hit him!  How can I say "sorry" when I didn"t do it?"  Even a young child has more wisdom than our leaders: you can"t apologize for something you did not do.

I am not sorry for owning slaves - I never did.

I am not sorry for my role in slavery - I never owned a slave, not even one.

I am sorry that slavery took place.  I"m also sorry about the Rape of Nanking, the Holocaust, the sacking of Rome, the Jonestown massacre, the burning of the Library of Alexandria, and Cain"s murder of his brother Abel.  I"m not about to apologize for any of those, though, as I didn"t do them.

Mr. Obama has spent much of his presidency apologizing all "round the world to anyone who will lend him an ear.  Supposedly, he is taking responsibility for all the evil things America is thought to have done.  In actuality, he is picking off old scabs and reopening old wounds by reminding the world of all the crimes our land is said to have committed.

Everyone makes mistakes and every nation contains evil people.  Sometimes generally good people do evil things.  When that happens, it"s appropriate to make amends, administering punishment and restitution wherever possible.  After all those involved are dead and gone, though, it"s not possible to deliver justice; rehashing a musty conflict revives it for a new generation.

The True Goal

Which, of course, is exactly the goal here, as the Post reveals.  First, there"s the usual leftist political goal of driving conservatism in general and Republicans in particular from the public arena entirely:

"The Republican Party needed to do it," Swain said. "It would have shed that racist scab on the party."

What racist scab, precisely, would that be?  It was a Republican who issued the Emancipation Proclamation and it was a Democratic Congress and President who stripped underprivileged black D.C. students of their ability to attend decent schools.  There is no historical reflection found here; it"s simply a modern and all-too-current slander for naked partisan political gain.

And financial gain too.

It could well be argued that the freed slaves should have received compensation.  Actually, for a time during Reconstruction, the federal government attempted something of that sort by providing ex-slaves with farm equipment and education.  Unfortunately, that system broke down and the less oppressive but still evil Jim Crow regime came into effect.

Thankfully, both slavery and Jim Crow have been consigned to the dustbin of history where they belong and where they ought to stay.  No American alive today has ever been a slave.  On what basis would one award compensation?  Ancestry?  We know white people whose ancestors were brought here as indentured servants before the Revolutionary War.  Their ancestors were undeniably subject to involuntary servitude, should they be compensated?

If we"re going to compensate people whose ancestors suffered, what about such white folks?  And what about the many, many black people - like Barack Obama himself - who has no ancestors that were ever enslaved by Americans?  How will we figure out who gets what, subpoena the Mormon Church"s extensive genealogical records?

More importantly, how does this sort of racial gerrymandering and demagoguery assist our nation to become "Out Of Many, One"?  "Divide and Conquer" is more like it.

We should be aware of our history so we don"t repeat the blunders of the past, but that"s not the same thing as being sorry for everything bad that your ancestors or fellow-citizens of the past ever did to anyone else.  Unless our leaders want the national costume to be sackcloth and ashes, it"s long past time for historical "apologies" to cease.

Instead, our leaders should concentrate on addressing our economic problems so we don"t wind up wearing sackcloth because it"s all we can afford.

Visit my Blog...